Comparison of modified triangular and horizontal osteotomy in sliding genioplasty
Originally at sciencedirect.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
Oral surgeons and orthodontists performing or referring for sliding genioplasty now have peer-reviewed evidence comparing two osteotomy designs that may alter intraoperative choice and postoperative outcomes.
Key points
- Study compares modified triangular osteotomy versus horizontal osteotomy in sliding genioplasty; published in Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, available online 6 October 2026.
- Authors are from a single research group (Zhuang et al.), providing level-3 evidence on technique-specific complications and stability.
- Findings may influence osteotomy selection for patients needing vertical or horizontal chin repositioning, particularly in combined orthognathic cases.
- Practices that perform orthognathic surgery should review the full article for quantitative differences in operative time, nerve injury rates, and relapse.
Who should care
Read the original on Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS)
Full reporting and any paywall content live on sciencedirect.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Regulatory
Is fluoride still safe for kids? A dentist breaks down what the research actually shows
- ·Research
Inflammasome-related transcriptomic profiles in periodontitis
- ·Research
Clinical efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin therapy during oral surgical interventions
- ·Regulatory
Making Sense of Medicare’s Dental Benefit: Top Five Questions from Learners