Osteogenic Outcomes and Associated Modifiable Factors of 3D‐Printed Individual Titanium Mesh Exposure: A Retrospective Analysis
By Minxue Yang, Yaxin Bai, Yuling Yang, Yujie Zhu, Houqi Zhou, Yuanding Huang, Tao Chen
Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
Implantologists and practice owners placing 3D-printed titanium meshes for ridge augmentation should monitor modifiable factors that raise exposure rates, because early exposure can compromise graft success and increase revision surgeries.
Key points
- Retrospective chart review of 3D-printed titanium mesh cases found that mesh exposure occurred in a substantial minority of patients, correlating with longer healing times and greater need for secondary procedures.
- Key modifiable risk factors identified included smoking, flap design, and timing of mesh removal—each independently associated with exposure rates.
- Clinics using 3D-printed custom meshes should consider smoking-cessation protocols, refined flap techniques, and scheduled early mesh retrieval to reduce complication costs.
- Specialists and DSOs evaluating capital investment in in-office 3-D printing should factor in the downstream costs of managing mesh exposure events.
Who should care
Read the original on Clinical Oral Implants Research
Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Business
Why the dental assistant shortage could get worse
- ·Business
US Oral Surgery Management exec on M&A: ‘We’ve had to be even more disciplined’
- ·Research
Vertical dimension of occlusion restoration using a digital injectable composite resin technique: A 5-year clinical follow-up
- ·Research
A digitally guided workflow integrating tooth preparation and restoration positioning for minimally invasive veneer and partial-coverage restorations: A dental technique