Intraoral ultrasonography for mid-buccal probing depth assessment
By Sefa Aydindogan, Metehan Ozdemir, Yunus Emre Balaban, Elif Mutafcılar Velioğlu, Sema S. Hakki, Kaan Orhan
Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
Periodontists, hygienists, and practice owners may gain a non-invasive option for mid-buccal probing depth assessment that matches clinical probing within 0.5 mm at 85 % of sites, potentially reducing patient discomfort and examiner variability.
Key points
- Intraoral 18-MHz ultrasound produced gingival sulcus depth readings with ICC 0.942 and mean absolute error 0.29 mm compared to UNC-15 probing at 963 mid-buccal sites.
- Molar sites showed the largest error (0.38 mm) and a mean underestimation of 0.123 mm relative to conventional probing.
- Agreement remained above ICC 0.78 across bleeding sites, calculus, crowns, orthodontic attachments, and smoking subgroups.
- Two trained examiners achieved inter-examiner reliability above ICC 0.90 when measuring the same ultrasound images.
Who should care
Read the original on Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Regulatory
Groups propose legislation allowing West Virginia dentists, hygienists to administer HPV vaccine
- ·Regulatory
Who is building the future of dental hygiene licensure?
- ·Regulatory
Michigan police search dental office after arresting dentist on drug charges
- ·Regulatory
Could the Dental Office Be the Next Stop for HPV Vaccination?