Authors’ response
Originally at sciencedirect.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
This authors’ response in JADA clarifies a published study, giving dental clinicians and researchers a corrected interpretation of its findings that may affect clinical decision-making and future research design.
Key points
- Authors Zahra Bagheri and Hyongsup Kimm address prior commentary on their JADA paper, refining how their results should be applied in dental practice and academic work.
- The response was published online 22 September 2026, establishing the current authoritative interpretation of the original study.
- Clinicians and investigators should review the clarification to ensure their understanding and use of the study data align with the authors’ final stance.
Who should care
Read the original on Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
Full reporting and any paywall content live on sciencedirect.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Research
From mouth to brain: linking periodontal and peri-implant dysbiosis to systemic
- ·Research
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus following endodontic treatment: a case report
- ·Research
Formulation-dependent hydrothermal degradation of ultratranslucent 5y-tzp zirconia
- ·Regulatory
California Expands Access to Fluoride Varnish