Adjunctive Electrolytic Implant Surface Decontamination in the Reconstructive Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
By Erik Regidor, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Jessica Berglundh‐Gottlieb, Jan Derks, Kostas Bougas
Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
This RCT shows that adding electrolytic implant-surface decontamination to surgical peri-implantitis treatment improves defect resolution and reduces reoperation risk—directly impacting specialists and practice owners who perform implant reconstruction.
Key points
- Study published in Clinical Oral Implants Research (Sept 2026) reports statistically higher radiographic bone fill and lower bleeding-on-probing scores with adjunctive electrolytic decontamination vs. mechanical cleaning alone.
- Protocol used a 3-second electrolytic pulse (NaCl electrolyte) delivered via a dedicated hand-piece; no adverse events attributed to the current.
- Patients treated with the electrolytic step required fewer additional surgeries within the 12-month follow-up, lowering downstream chair-time and cost for both DSOs and independent practices.
- Findings apply to moderately rough implant surfaces and intrabony defects ≥3 mm; clinicians treating these cases may consider updating surgical trays or referral criteria.
Who should care
Read the original on Clinical Oral Implants Research
Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Research
Block Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral for Guided Bone Regeneration of Peri‐Implant Dehiscence Defects: A 5‐Year Randomized Controlled Trial
- ·Research
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing a One‐Piece Zirconia Tissue‐Level Implant and Two‐Piece Titanium Bone‐Level Implant for Maxillary Single Tooth Replacement—3 year Results
- ·Research
Effect of Implant Design on Fracture Resistance, Mode, and Crystal Structure of One‐ and Two‐Piece Zirconia Implants With Ceramic or Titanium Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study
- ·Research
A 3‐Year Split‐Mouth Randomized Non‐Inferiority Controlled Trial Comparing Cement‐Retained Monolithic CAD‐CAM Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns for Single Posterior Implant Restorations