Accuracy and Efficiency of Dynamic Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery Using Three Different Registration Methods—A Laboratory Study
By Toshiki Nojiri, Kevser Pala, Ryo Yamamoto, Akihiro Fukutoku, Kazuhiro Kon, Shigemi Nagai, German O. Gallucci
Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
Laboratory data on dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery show registration method choice directly affects placement accuracy and chair time, giving implant clinicians and practices using navigation systems concrete guidance on workflow selection to reduce deviation and operative duration.
Key points
- Three registration methods compared in a controlled lab setting using dynamic navigation for implant osteotomy preparation.
- Accuracy measured by angular, coronal, and apical deviations; efficiency measured by total registration plus drilling time.
- Results will appear in Clinical Oral Implants Research, August 2026 (online ahead of print).
- Applicable to any practice or DSO evaluating or currently using dynamic navigation systems for implants.
Who should care
Read the original on Clinical Oral Implants Research
Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Business
US Oral Surgery Management exec on M&A: ‘We’ve had to be even more disciplined’
- ·Research
Vertical dimension of occlusion restoration using a digital injectable composite resin technique: A 5-year clinical follow-up
- ·Research
A digitally guided workflow integrating tooth preparation and restoration positioning for minimally invasive veneer and partial-coverage restorations: A dental technique
- ·Research
Effect of a Novel Bioceramic Solvent on Apical Patency during Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment: An Ex Vivo Study