MEDIUMClinicalTier 1

Investigations of Intraoral Scan Body Extensions. Effect of Design on the Accuracy, Usability, and Feasibility for Digital Full‐Arch Implant Scans In Vitro

SourceClinical Oral Implants ResearchTier 1Peer-Reviewed Research

By Julian Hessel Baranowski, Michael Braian, Victoria Franke Stenport, Ann Wennerberg

Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.

Why it matters for dental

In-vitro study shows scan-body extension design significantly affects accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.

Key points

  • Certain extension geometries produced statistically significant angular and linear deviations exceeding clinical thresholds for passive fit.
  • Shorter or asymmetric extensions improved both trueness and scanning time, lowering chairside adjustments and potential remake costs.
  • No scan body design eliminated the need for verification; clinicians should still cross-check full-arch scans with a conventional index or photogrammetry.
  • DSOs and high-volume implant practices may standardize scan body selection protocols to reduce variability across multiple surgeons and scanners.

Who should care

SpecialistAssociate

Read the original on Clinical Oral Implants Research

Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.

Open original

Related