Investigations of Intraoral Scan Body Extensions. Effect of Design on the Accuracy, Usability, and Feasibility for Digital Full‐Arch Implant Scans In Vitro
By Julian Hessel Baranowski, Michael Braian, Victoria Franke Stenport, Ann Wennerberg
Originally at onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Summary & scoring by The Bell Brief (Dr. Jennifer Bell) using the Drill-Down Protocol (Drill-Down Score) — not the original publisher.
Why it matters for dental
In-vitro study shows scan-body extension design significantly affects accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.
Key points
- Certain extension geometries produced statistically significant angular and linear deviations exceeding clinical thresholds for passive fit.
- Shorter or asymmetric extensions improved both trueness and scanning time, lowering chairside adjustments and potential remake costs.
- No scan body design eliminated the need for verification; clinicians should still cross-check full-arch scans with a conventional index or photogrammetry.
- DSOs and high-volume implant practices may standardize scan body selection protocols to reduce variability across multiple surgeons and scanners.
Who should care
Read the original on Clinical Oral Implants Research
Full reporting and any paywall content live on onlinelibrary.wiley.com. We summarize and score; we do not republish.
Related
- ·Regulatory
Florida dental office remains closed amid patient death investigation
- ·Business
130+ DSO affiliations so far in 2026: State-by-state breakdown
- ·Regulatory
Congressman Introduces ORTHO Act for Teledentistry Safety
- ·Regulatory
BAXTER ISSUES VOLUNTARY NATIONWIDE RECALL OF CEFAZOLIN IN DEXTROSE INJECTION, USP, 2G / 100ML (20MG / ML) SINGLE-DOSE INFUSION BAG IN 100ML DUE TO PARTICULATE MATTER FOUND IN SOLUTION